00:00:10 well..I mean like 00:00:19 BeOS..X Window..that kind of thing 00:00:25 something similar to those 00:01:17 they all have those 00:01:27 kewl.. 00:01:28 AROS is the most primitive out of them all in that area 00:01:35 AROS tho is really lacking 00:01:44 it seems that all of these OSes Shells look just like Linux's, why is that? 00:02:52 because many of them learned GUI from X, which Linux uses. 00:03:18 kewl 00:03:39 AtheOS learned it from Amiga however, so it looks like an Amiga 00:04:05 so, would Inferno be extremely efficient at networking, because it's a networking OS, more so than Win9x? 00:04:11 yes 00:04:31 also Inferno is a cross-platform OS. Binaries for it will run on any CPU that can run Inferno 00:04:33 Inferno is nifty 00:04:43 it kicks Amie's ass 00:04:45 The tunes project really ought to buy a nmonn-commercial license and release it 00:04:53 downix nods 00:04:57 (Once you have a license you can redistribute it in any form unlimited) 00:05:03 00:05:09 And a NC license is only 250 bucks 00:05:12 that's kewl...will inferno run on x86? 00:05:23 or something like that... 00:05:23 00:05:27 Randune: yes 00:05:36 right on.. 00:05:44 I'll donate 25 cents... 00:06:10 kewl, AtheOS looks cool, how stable is it? 00:06:16 quite stable 00:06:27 are there many apps for it? 00:07:09 not really 00:07:26 yeah..that's the only thing that sux 00:07:29 statnet? 00:07:38 maybe I should stay with one of the bigger OSes 00:07:57 depends on what your doing 00:08:09 for word processing stick with linux/freebsd{TeX} or windows(word) 00:08:22 I love TeX 00:08:27 for OS devel, install everything and juggle partitions :) 00:08:27 and AtheOS has EMACS 00:08:48 right on 00:08:52 what is FreeBSD tex? 00:09:15 TeX is a typesetting package 00:09:22 EMACS is god! 00:09:22 which means what? 00:09:23 hehe 00:09:23 ) 00:09:49 Randune: it means it's like postscript 00:10:02 well..my 4 fav Oses are: Win9x, Linux, BeOS, AmigaOS 00:10:10 I see 00:10:21 my 4 fav OSes are NT, NT, NT, NT 00:10:25 anyone here used BeOS? 00:10:31 eh 00:11:00 I like the simplicity of BeOS 00:11:06 and it's quite powerfull too 00:11:09 My fave OS's are AmigaOS, Linux, QNX, and CAOS 00:11:17 kewl 00:11:26 I wish I had an Amiga 4000T 00:11:28 they rock 00:11:35 with a Video Toaster:) 00:12:47 does BeOS have an X Server? 00:13:11 dunno 00:13:15 I have an Amiga 1000 00:13:37 I have an Amiga 500.. 00:14:32 I wouldn't want an A4000T 00:14:39 I'd rather have an A2000 or A3000T 00:15:22 well..the A2000 is the same as the A500 pretty much, just more room cause it's in a desktop case 00:16:19 and Zorro 2 slots 00:16:26 and a video slot 00:17:04 yeah 00:17:11 but the A4000T is much more powerfull 00:18:23 no it isn't 00:18:36 the 4000T is a major hack-job 00:18:48 and that is from David Haynie who designed it 00:18:48 it's the best one...has all kinds of bells and whistles 00:19:04 no, the 3000T is the ultimate Amiga according to him and everyone else at Commodore 00:19:09 you can probablly get an A3000 for pretty cheap used from somewere 00:19:29 hell no, the 3000 is more expensive than the 4000 00:19:36 people know how valulable they are 00:19:54 hmm..wish I could get one:) 00:20:05 downix nods 00:20:09 I want a 3000T or a 2000 00:20:31 I'd say the 3000T for sure 00:20:43 with the Video Toaster:) 00:20:52 downix 00:20:55 you're in the states 00:20:59 why don't you check out ebay? 00:21:09 I did 00:21:24 only found a single 3000 in the past 8 months 00:21:27 nothin' there? 00:21:29 found 90 4000 00:21:55 hehe 00:22:25 I bought a few things from eBat 00:22:27 eBay 00:23:04 nice..sorry all..but I have to go.. 00:23:11 thanks for all your input..see yah 00:23:15 [QUIT] Randune quit: Leaving 00:26:15 [QUIT] nate37 quit: Read error to nate37[cx83983-d.irvn1.occa.home.com]: Connection reset by peer 01:07:28 I440r joined #tunes 01:41:00 Kyle_L joined #tunes 02:11:02 [QUIT] Kyle_L quit: Leaving 02:17:46 [QUIT] nate37 quit: i am tired 02:28:09 [QUIT] downix quit: downix has no reason 02:39:44 [QUIT] eihrul quit: [x]chat 03:36:02 eihrul joined #tunes 04:01:29 Fare joined #tunes 04:02:13 gakuk 04:02:19 gakuk 04:11:39 what's up? 04:11:43 no, he is a gas 04:12:34 Fare was shocked by this sentence, in an article about translation from one language into another: "He is a gas." 04:12:43 where what specifically infers any event in the immediate past, present, or future that may be relevant :) 04:32:43 [QUIT] eihrul quit: Ping timeout for eihrul[usr5-ppp83.lvdi.net] 05:32:12 [QUIT] air quit: http://www.qzx.com/ :: 07:02:22 eihrul joined #tunes 08:32:58 smklsmkl joined #tunes 08:53:07 [QUIT] smklsmkl quit: bbl 09:22:57 FareTower joined #tunes 09:23:49 [QUIT] Fare quit: Killed (NickServ (This nick is reserved by another user)) 09:24:23 [NICK] FareTower changed nick to: Fare 09:46:52 [QUIT] Fare quit: Ping timeout for Fare[r120m151.cybercable.tm.fr] 09:55:47 smklsmkl joined #tunes 09:56:18 Kyle_L joined #tunes 09:58:36 Fare joined #tunes 10:01:05 Hi Fare 10:08:16 lo, KL 10:10:46 Would you happen to know any references to how dynamic classes are handled? 10:11:07 I find that handling dynamic classes is slow because few assumptions can be made. 10:12:04 I am trying to come up with a "fixing specification" to allow me to make the optimizing assumptions in a temporary operating realm. 10:13:12 I am familiar with typing, and functional optimizations. I am concerned with structural optimization (making better datastructures). 10:15:40 dynamic classes, as in modifying the metaclass in CLOS? 10:15:49 yes 10:16:00 Hum. Look for litterature about Common LISP, CECIL, Dylan, and more. 10:16:40 Bibliographic searches and USENET searches (in comp.lang.{lisp,dylan}) could help. 10:17:08 Dylan has a way to "seal" classes so as to allow optimizations. 10:18:15 That sounds static wrt to the execution of the program that uses the sealed class. 10:23:40 thanks 10:28:17 yes, sealing is static wrt execution, and that's the whole point. 10:28:29 Else what you want is a mechanism of cacheing and invalidation 10:28:50 i.e. modifying (setf foo) so that it does some invalidation. 10:29:16 and/or modifying (getf foo) so that it does some coherency testing. 10:29:41 Exactly. 10:31:35 Having dynamic class changes is a powerful tool. The invalidation code is expensive, but is not used often. I beleive it makes up for the programmer time lost. 10:32:22 Once the first "fixing specification" is complete, I am sure optimizations will be apparent. 10:37:02 I hope I am clear enough on what I am trying to do. May you tell me if this goes under a name other than "fixing specification"? 12:05:56 ult_ joined #tunes 12:06:46 [QUIT] ult quit: Leaving 12:07:46 [QUIT] ult_ quit: [x]chat 12:23:26 ult joined #tunes 14:43:49 ult joined #tunes 15:40:42 Kyle: still there? It goes by the name dynamic specialization (a technique popularized in Self). 15:57:30 [QUIT] ult quit: Ping timeout for ult[user-38lccdf.dialup.mindspring.com] 16:28:10 smoke joined #tunes 16:30:32 ult joined #tunes 16:34:06 [QUIT] lar1 quit: Ping timeout for lar1[129.210.96.211] 16:50:13 td joined #tunes 17:24:59 ult joined #tunes 17:58:13 eihrul joined #tunes 18:00:39 [NICK] UltTheHighPope changed nick to: ult 18:07:10 Arrakis: Most of those classes do not exist in AP form d00d, stop BS'ing. 18:14:27 [QUIT] td quit: BitchX: the headache medicine 18:16:07 [QUIT] _ruiner_ quit: destroy what destroys you 19:41:11 water joined #tunes 19:41:20 re 19:59:42 hi 19:59:49 hey kyle 20:00:01 eih and i are working on slate right now 20:00:09 Do you have a suggestion on a refactoring book? 20:00:29 yes, _Refactoring_ by Kent Beck :) 20:00:48 Can I work on slate too?? 20:00:55 heh 20:01:03 talk to eihrul 20:01:16 he's making a pidgin slate-self 20:01:21 what is being worked on now? 20:01:32 water points at his previos statement 20:01:51 i'm working on the "type" system 20:02:04 i.e. more specs 20:02:45 (when i figure the idea out in large-scale terms) 20:24:08 hm... for the xml buffs... 20:24:23 http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/xmill/ 20:26:58 also from Wadler... :) 20:27:00 http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/who/wadler/xml/ 20:27:21 [NICK] coreyr_ changed nick to: ozs 20:28:16 for the straight dope on xml :) 20:38:35 [QUIT] Melinda quit: Art is a fleeting glimpse into an untamed soul. 20:46:15 [QUIT] ozs quit: gonna see if pegasus lets coreyr stay on all night 21:01:16 [QUIT] rares quit: Ping timeout for rares[dnbr-sh1-port76.snet.net] 21:32:47 [QUIT] air quit: http://www.qzx.com/ :: sleep 21:51:25 [QUIT] coreyr quit: Leaving 21:52:13 wuhai joined #tunes 21:52:13 [QUIT] ink quit: Ping timeout for ink[1Cust231.tnt31.sfo3.da.uu.net] 21:52:19 wuhai left #tunes 21:54:15 pah, whatever =) 21:54:51 sorry, it was distracting me 21:56:21 [QUIT] ult quit: idle, no point in having irc open. 21:56:38 heh, there's a concept :) 21:59:18 jeza joined #tunes 22:00:02 hey there! 22:00:16 hi 22:00:30 what can we do for ya? 22:00:39 how are you 22:00:51 not bad, thinking 22:01:06 about tunes, of course :) 22:01:10 not much just cruisin and saw tunes 22:01:16 ok 22:01:35 you guys musso's?? 22:01:41 "musso"? 22:01:52 musicians 22:01:57 heh 22:02:08 nope, look at http://www.tunes.org 22:02:20 ok 22:02:27 actually about half of us are decent musicians 22:02:38 but that's not what the "tunes" thing is :) 22:04:22 aahh right 22:04:55 just noticed smoke on the water 22:04:58 10£àughing 10Ôut 10£oud 22:05:01 heh 22:05:13 i never noticed that, actually :) 22:06:04 anyway i'll catch ya later 22:06:11 ok 22:06:11 jeza left #tunes 22:30:38 the average number of books read by a programmer in the USA is 0.4 22:30:48 sorry, that should be quoted 22:30:55 "the average number of books read by a programmer in the USA is 0.4 " 22:31:27 i must be making up for a lot of illiterate programmers :) 22:41:12 whoa... 22:41:15 are you serious? 22:41:20 dunno 22:41:29 i saw it quoted in a smalltalk article 22:41:39 well, is that a per year figure? 22:41:43 a lifetime figure, wha? :) 22:41:47 yearly 22:42:05 okay :) 22:42:15 mentioned in a neighboring sentence 22:42:34 but then again, don't forget other mechanisms like postscript :) 22:42:44 of course 22:42:58 it was probably one of those stuffy studies 22:43:24 where they measure something completely meaningless because no one will respect the real data 00:18:54 blah